Home / Blog / FAQ: Top Tips for Winning an Insurance Appeal (What Actually Works)
February 21, 2026

FAQ: Top Tips for Winning an Insurance Appeal (What Actually Works)

What actually increases your chances of winning an insurance appeal? Based on how insurers evaluate appeals, here are the 10 most impactful things you can do to overturn a denial and get your claim paid.

FAQ: Top Tips for Winning an Insurance Appeal (What Actually Works)

Winning an insurance appeal is not about luck. It's about giving the reviewer exactly the evidence they need, in the format they can act on, addressing the exact reasons the claim was denied. Based on how insurance appeals are evaluated — and what distinguishes overturned denials from sustained ones — here are the highest-impact things you can do.

Tip 1: Read the Denial Letter Like a Lawyer

Most people skim the denial letter and focus on the conclusion ("your claim is denied"). The key is in the specific grounds — the exact clinical criteria or policy provision the insurer relied on to deny your claim.

Every word matters:

  • "Not medically necessary based on Clinical Policy Bulletin 0341" → Your appeal must directly address CPB 0341's criteria
  • "Service excluded under section 5.3(b) of your policy" → Your appeal must explain why 5.3(b) doesn't apply or is being misapplied
  • "Prior authorization not obtained" → Your appeal must address why PA was not required or should be waived

If you don't know what criteria or provision governs your claim, request a copy from the insurer before writing your appeal.

Tip 2: Get a Specialist's Letter, Not Just Your GP's

The single most impactful upgrade you can make to any health insurance appeal is getting a specialist's letter instead of (or in addition to) a primary care physician letter.

Why it matters: Your insurer's clinical reviewer is typically a physician. A letter from a board-certified specialist in the relevant field (cardiologist, oncologist, orthopaedic surgeon, psychiatrist, etc.) carries dramatically more weight than a letter from a GP. It speaks the same language as the reviewer.

The specialist's letter must:

  • State your diagnosis precisely using clinical terminology
  • Address the insurer's specific denial criteria by name
  • Explain why you meet those criteria
  • Cite peer-reviewed clinical guidelines supporting the treatment
  • Explain why alternatives are not appropriate for your specific case

Tip 3: Request Peer-to-Peer Review

Peer-to-peer review is a direct phone call between your treating specialist and the insurer's reviewing physician. It is one of the most effective (and underused) appeal tools.

Why it works:

  • Specialists communicate more effectively with each other than through written letters
  • Misunderstandings about clinical details can be resolved in real time
  • The reviewing physician can ask questions and clarify concerns
  • Many denials that look firm on paper are reversed after peer-to-peer review

Ask specifically: "My physician would like to request a peer-to-peer review with your clinical reviewer. How do we arrange this?" Do this before and during the formal appeal process.

Tip 4: Address Every Single Denial Ground — Don't Skip Any

Your appeal must address every reason the insurer gave for denial. Leaving even one ground unaddressed gives the insurer a basis to uphold the denial even if you've rebutted everything else.

Structure your appeal to directly quote each denial reason and then systematically rebut it with evidence. Use numbered sections that mirror the insurer's denial letter.

Tip 5: Know (and Cite) the Applicable Law

Many appeals succeed because the denial violated a law the policyholder or their physician cited in the appeal letter. Key laws to know:

US:

  • ACA Essential Health Benefits: Certain benefits must be covered
  • MHPAEA: Mental health and SUD benefits cannot be more restricted than medical benefits
  • NMHPA: Minimum 48/96 hour hospital stay after delivery
  • No Surprises Act: Emergency care coverage from out-of-network providers
  • Your state's specific mandates (fertility, autism ABA, step therapy reform, etc.)

UK: FCA's Treating Customers Fairly; Insurance Act 2015 (fair presentation of risk) Australia: Private Health Insurance Act 2007 Singapore: FIDREC jurisdiction; LIA guidelines Malaysia: IFSA/FSA; OFS jurisdiction

Citing the specific law by name, section number, and how your case is governed by it signals to the reviewer that you know your rights.

Tip 6: Include Clinical Guidelines from Professional Bodies

Your insurer's reviewer must engage with clinical guidelines from recognised professional bodies. Include the relevant guidelines directly in your appeal.

US sources:

  • US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
  • American College of Physicians (ACP)
  • American Cancer Society (ACS)
  • American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP)
  • American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM)
  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) — for oncology
  • American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association (ACC/AHA)

UK: NICE guidelines (nice.org.uk) — the gold standard for UK clinical evidence Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Singapore/Malaysia: MOH Clinical Practice Guidelines

If your treatment is recommended by the relevant professional body, this is extremely powerful evidence.

Tip 7: Submit Objective, Measurable Evidence — Not Just Opinions

Objective evidence is harder to dismiss than physician opinions. Include:

  • Imaging reports (MRI, CT, X-ray) with radiologist findings
  • Lab results and pathology reports
  • Standardised functional assessments (FIM, Oswestry Index, COPM)
  • CPAP compliance data
  • Pain scale documentation over time
  • Vital signs and clinical measurements

For disability and rehabilitation appeals: standardised functional assessments showing specific, measurable limitations are far more persuasive than general statements about being unable to function.

Tip 8: Use the External Review Process Strategically

If your internal appeal fails, don't view external review as a last resort. View it as the review by an independent clinical professional who has no financial incentive to deny your claim.

Prepare your external review differently from your internal appeal:

  • Add the strongest specialist evidence you can obtain
  • Add peer-reviewed literature
  • Directly address whatever specific grounds the insurer's appeal denial cited

External review success rates are significant — 30–60% in the US, with meaningful rates in other jurisdictions. The preparation you do for external review matters.

Tip 9: File Regulatory Complaints in Parallel

Filing a complaint with your state's Department of Insurance (or equivalent regulator) at the same time as your appeal creates parallel pressure. Regulatory complaints:

  • Are free
  • Create a formal regulatory record
  • Can independently resolve disputes (regulators sometimes call insurers on behalf of complainants)
  • Signal that you are serious about pursuing all available remedies
  • Are relevant if you ultimately pursue legal action

In the US, regulators can investigate insurers for systematic unfair claims practices — your individual complaint can contribute to broader accountability.

Tip 10: Be Persistent — Most People Give Up Too Early

The most important tip: Most insurance appeal denials succeed not because the insurer was right but because the policyholder gave up.

The data supports persistence:

  • Internal appeals are reversed in a meaningful proportion of cases
  • External reviews overturn internal appeal denials 30–60% of the time (US)
  • FOS (UK) upholds insurance complaints in approximately 35–40% of cases
  • FIDREC (Singapore), OFS (Malaysia), AFCA/PHIO (Australia) all produce meaningful consumer-favourable outcomes

Every level of escalation is a new opportunity. The insurer's internal reviewer is not the final decision-maker. The external reviewer, the ombudsman, and ultimately the court are all genuinely independent decision-makers who may see the facts very differently.

What Doesn't Work

Emotional appeals: Emotional language in appeal letters doesn't help. Reviewers are evaluating clinical evidence and policy terms, not your suffering. Keep the letter professional and factual.

General statements without evidence: "This treatment is absolutely necessary" without specific clinical documentation doesn't move clinical reviewers. Specific diagnostic findings, clinical criteria, and physician documentation are what matter.

Submitting the same evidence again: A second appeal that duplicates your first without new, stronger evidence will typically get the same result. Add something new and more compelling every time.

Delaying: Appeals have strict deadlines. Missing a deadline can forfeit your rights. File promptly and follow up proactively.

Conclusion

Winning an insurance appeal comes down to giving the right reviewer (internal or external) exactly the clinical evidence they need to see that the denial was wrong. A specialist's letter addressing the insurer's criteria, peer-reviewed clinical guidelines, objective measurements, and the correct legal framework are the building blocks of a winning appeal. Use ClaimBack at claimback.app to generate a professional, structured appeal letter that incorporates these elements from the start.


Related Reading:

Dealing with a denied claim?

Get a professional appeal letter in minutes — no legal expertise required.

Analyse My Claim — Free →