Insurance Appeal Success Rates: What the Data Actually Shows

The insurance industry benefits enormously from the gap between what policyholders are entitled to and what they actually claim. Nowhere is this gap more pronounced than in appeal rates. Across every major insurance market, data consistently shows that a substantial proportion of denied claims are overturned on appeal — yet the vast majority of denied claimants never file one.

Here's what the data actually shows, and what it means for your situation.

The Core Statistic: Most People Never Appeal

Studies and regulatory data from multiple jurisdictions consistently show that fewer than 1 in 100 people who receive a denial letter actually file a formal appeal. In the US ACA market, KFF Health News has reported that fewer than 0.2% of denied claims result in an appeal to an independent external reviewer.

This is the insurance company's greatest advantage — not the legal strength of the denial, but the statistical certainty that most people will accept it and move on.

What the Data Shows by Market

United States

The most publicly available data comes from the US, where ACA marketplace plans are required to report denial and appeal data.

• External review success rate: US government data on ERISA employer plans shows that consumers win 40–60% of external reviews. For ACA marketplace plans, independent external reviews also see significant reversal rates.
• Internal appeal success: Internal appeals succeed less often than external reviews, but even here, a meaningful percentage of decisions are reversed — often because the internal appeals team applies more scrutiny to borderline denials.

Australia

AFCA publishes detailed annual statistics on financial disputes, including insurance.

• Approximately 40–45% of insurance complaints lodged with AFCA result in an outcome that improves on the insurer's original decision — through early resolution, conciliation, or adjudication.
• General insurance (car, home, travel) sees higher reversal rates than life insurance, partly because policy wording is often clearer and disputes more factual.

United Kingdom

FOS publishes detailed uphold rates by financial firm and product type.

• Across all insurance products, FOS upholds roughly 30–40% of complaints in favour of the consumer.
• For some specific insurers and claim types, upheld rates are substantially higher — sometimes exceeding 60%.
• Importantly, FOS data represents only cases that reach FOS; many insurers reverse decisions at the internal complaint stage once a policyholder demonstrates they know their rights.

Singapore

FIDReC does not publish detailed success rate statistics publicly, but handles a significant volume of insurance disputes annually.

• Industry practitioners consistently report that mediation resolves a large proportion of cases with some form of consumer benefit.
• The threat of FIDReC escalation alone frequently motivates insurers to offer settlement during the internal appeal phase.

Malaysia

The OFS handles hundreds of insurance complaints annually.

• Cases involving ambiguous policy terms or inadequate claims investigation by the insurer have historically seen favourable outcomes for consumers.
• OFS adjudications in favour of consumers are binding on member insurers.

---

Why Appealed Claims Succeed

The high reversal rate on appeals isn't a fluke. There are systematic reasons why denied claims, when properly challenged, are often overturned.

Frontline decisions are made under pressure

Claims handlers process high volumes of claims under time pressure. Initial denials are often made on the basis of a quick review of the file — without deep engagement with the specific policy wording, medical evidence, or regulatory context. A formal, well-argued appeal forces a more careful look.

Policy wording is often genuinely ambiguous

Insurance policies are written by lawyers, but they're applied to messy real-world situations. The gap between what a policy says and what it means in your specific circumstances is often real — and regulators and ombudsman services consistently resolve that ambiguity in favour of the consumer.

Regulators have teeth

In markets where ombudsman decisions are binding (Australia, UK) or where regulators actively investigate complaints (Singapore, Malaysia, UAE), insurers have strong incentives to settle reasonable disputes rather than face a ruling against them.

New evidence changes the analysis

The most common reason for a successful appeal is the submission of new or better evidence — typically a doctor's letter that specifically addresses the insurer's grounds for denial. The initial claim may have lacked this targeted evidence; the appeal provides it.

---

What Improves Your Success Rate

The data is averages. Your individual success rate depends heavily on the quality of your appeal. Here's what the evidence shows matters most:

1. Citing specific regulations. Appeals that reference the relevant regulatory standards (e.g., FCA Consumer Duty, AFCA guidelines, ERISA provisions) are taken more seriously than those that don't.

2. Directly addressing the denial reason. Every point in the insurer's denial letter should be specifically rebutted. Generic "I disagree with this decision" letters are far less effective.

3. Medical support from your treating doctor. A letter from your specialist that directly addresses the insurer's "not medically necessary" or "pre-existing condition" argument is one of the most powerful pieces of evidence you can submit.

4. Acting promptly. There are deadlines on appeals — internal and external. Cases filed quickly signal seriousness and prevent the clock from running out.

5. Professional letter quality. A formal, structured letter demonstrates you understand the process and are prepared to escalate. Insurers settle more readily when they believe the claimant will follow through.

---

The Bottom Line

The data is clear: appealing works. The majority of people who file well-structured appeals with proper evidence and regulatory citations get better outcomes than they would have by accepting the denial.

The barrier isn't knowledge — it's the time and effort required to write a professional appeal letter. That's exactly what ClaimBack removes.

Ready to fight back? Generate your appeal letter free →